Which is exactly why the serious software belongs here. A forty‑location group can absorb a missed claim inside a team whose job it is to catch it. You absorb it personally, between patients, at seven in the evening.
More than one location?The problem is different, and so is the page →Not because anyone is slow. Because the administrative load of a single practice is larger than the hours one desk has to give it.
Illustrative — a single‑provider practice at about eighteen patients a day. Run your own inputs on Run the Numbers; the shape is the same at every size, only the overflow changes.
The last three items are the ones that fall off. They are also the three that decide what the practice earns.
A single‑provider practice loses the same four things a forty‑location group loses. It just has no department positioned to catch any of them.
Not all of it is winnable. Some treatment was declined for good reasons, some recall patients have moved, some denials were correct. A number that claims otherwise is selling you something.
Base case: about eighteen patients a day and roughly $900,000 in annual collections. Every figure on this page is drawn from that one practice, so the numbers can be checked against each other.
At a group, that gap is a variance line somebody reviews each quarter. In a solo practice it is the owner's income, and nobody reviews it at all.
Most practices in this position buy one of three things. Each solves part of the problem, and each has an annual cost worth putting next to ours, on the same $900,000 practice.
Any vendor pitching that outcome to a two‑person practice has misunderstood the business. The work that moves is the work nobody wanted; what is left is the part that needs a person.
Verification, resubmissions, chasing recall lists, the statements nobody got to: the work nobody wanted anyway.
The person at your front desk is the reason patients come back. Nothing here is designed to remove them.
The one hour fifty. And, for the first time, someone reading the numbers every morning.
The question is not whether to spend money on this problem. It is which version of the spend also tells you whether it worked.
The second half of that sentence is the one worth reading.
Claims, verifications and appeals, priced per unit, so you pay for what actually ran, and a good month doesn't cost you more.
The bill follows the work that ran, not what you collected — which matters most in the months a small practice can least afford a surprise.
Vella reads your practice and tells you what it would do. Nothing is posted, appealed or rescheduled until you say so, and you can leave it there.
The price is set with you before anything starts — in an hour with Natalie and John, not on a sales call.
Run your own numbers before you talk to anyone here. If the honest answer is that you do not need us, the tool returns that verdict on its own.
Run the Numbers
Nothing on this page is worth much until it is applied to your practice. Run the Numbers uses your figures, takes a few minutes, and will tell you to do nothing when that is the honest answer.
The scalable operating system that actually improves financial performance on its own.